६.
་་་་་་་་་་་
ny
I Haruld
Jaz
desirable
of policy was discussed some little line ass in
Conn vecin
with the jambia, and probably
Preina farcie
in other cases.
In Antrobus
nothing that really
After prolonged search I can
bears
An
235
fund this question.
that it
not
The Gambia
Case
to colich
you
refer
to make it Emag
for foreisu Cemsianies
to hold
and
$R. Cam nothing share.
to
land in
place like Hong
The
Kong.
rate
I think
that he should see what our
holicy has
subject
t
lo
been, and, wilay
any general ruling
the question
ach Sir 3.
Lugard for further explanations
to the adriaalitity, of
ordinance.
presumably that
camented papers. but there
discussi
Ja general question.
ttiere alima bing in force
Laws
in the
was then Hantia nod not allar- alieno & hold (and at all
with the mettant so caused
The only
Ј
*
the papers dealt
minimizing
the incorreciac
other prafes which anybody
has her able to suppl
Bermuda
24236/014
من
no
Here at
a
م کیا
Exertion
passing this
Wht. Jul
10
at
Sineral Dest
Can you find my general
muling inprecedents? B/20/1
Mr. Stubles
I can find nothing noted in g.. on this point
43.
21.7
41610 for 12.
relating
au...
the laws which forbade
alisu to hold land
But there
are
not parallel
There is nothing to prevent
on Indusfund
cases
map from holding land in Haughing
{ and, as a
I kaliwa
Sur-
See
a
a
th
matter of fart.
great deal of land is held
Chinose merchants
སྙན་ཆ་ས
freija
may of rohan
are.
Chirone suffects. Har I do not rocoon of principle against allowing
Corporation
to hold land, &
matter of fact, such compon Corporations
are allawat to do so
the
Smal
we cannot.
question of
arce 3g 90
vey will take upp primaple now. Hangkang
(see 8886,90) is a wor
It gives the
in to mint
Missions Etrangères (who
you
If the way hold a great deal
land in
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.